ESC Congress 2024 — No benefit of continuing oral anticoagulation during TAVI procedure.
Investigator, Dr Dirk-Jan van Ginkel (St Antonius Hospital, NL) joins us to discuss the result of the POPular PAUSE TAVI trial (NCT04437303; St Antonius Hospital). Presented for the first time at ESC 2024, this multicenter, randomized, open-label clinical trial compared the safety and efficacy of continuous versus interrupted oral anticoagulant (OAC) therapy during transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). A total of 858 patients were randomized to either continued or interrupted OAC treatment. The primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular death, any stroke, myocardial infarction, major vascular complications, and VARC-3 defined type 2-4 bleeding events at 30 days post-TAVI.
Findings show that in patients undergoing TAVI with an indication for oral anticoagulation, periprocedural continuation was not found to be noninferior to interruption of oral anticoagulation during TAVI.
Interview Questions:
- What is the background to the POPular PAUSE TAVI trial?
- What was the study design, eligibility criteria and outcome measures?
- What are the findings?
- Are there any patient subgroups that benefit more from continuous OAC?
- What are the take-home messages for practice? (+Should these findings influence guidelines?)
- What are the next steps?
Recorded on-site at ESC Congress 2024, London.
Editors: Jordan Rance and Mirjam Boros.
Videographers: Mike Knight, Dan Brent, Oliver Miles, Tom Green, David-Ben-Harosh.
Support: This is an independent interview produced by Radcliffe Cardiology.
Comments