Ep 121: OMI/NOMI: A Paradigm Shift in Myocardial Infarction Diagnosis With Dr Stephen Smith

Average (ratings)

No ratings

•

Your rating

In this week's episode of Parallax, host Dr Ankur Kalra engages in a thought-provoking discussion with Dr Stephen Smith, a pioneer in electrocardiography and myocardial infarction diagnosis. They delve into the groundbreaking OMI/NOMI paradigm (Occlusion MI vs Non-Occlusion MI), challenging the traditional STEMI vs non-STEMI terminology that has long been the cornerstone of acute coronary syndrome management.

Dr Smith presents compelling evidence highlighting the limitations of ST-elevation as a marker for acute coronary occlusion, discussing his recently published review paper: "From ST-Segment Elevation MI to Occlusion MI: The New Paradigm Shift in Acute Myocardial Infarction".

The conversation explores the proposed shift to the OMI/NOMI terminology and the specific ECG criteria for diagnosing occlusion MI. Dr Smith discusses the challenges in disseminating this new paradigm and teaching these refined ECG interpretation skills to clinicians. Dr Kalra and Dr Smith explore exciting developments in AI-assisted OMI detection and ongoing studies aimed at validating the OMI/NOMI approach.

How can clinicians effectively implement the OMI/NOMI criteria into daily practice? What challenges exist in teaching these new ECG interpretation skills, and how can they be overcome? What advice does Dr Smith have for our listeners?

Sources:
Herman R, et al. Eur Heart J Digit Health 2023. International evaluation of an artificial intelligence–powered electrocardiogram model detecting acute coronary occlusion myocardial infarction. DOI: 10.1093/ehjdh/ztad010
Meyers HP, et al. IJC Heart & Vasculature 2021. Accuracy of OMI ECG findings versus STEMI criteria for diagnosis of acute coronary occlusion myocardial infarction. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2021.100767
Meyers HP, et al. J Emerg Med 2021. Comparison of the ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) vs. NSTEMI and Occlusion MI (OMI) vs. NOMI Paradigms of Acute MI. DOI: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2020.10.026
Smith SW, Meyers HP. Ann Emerg Med 2023. Hyperacute T-waves Can Be a Useful Sign of Occlusion Myocardial Infarction if Appropriately Defined. DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2023.01.011
Meyers HP, et al. J Am Heart Assoc 2021. Ischemic ST‐Segment Depression Maximal in V1–V4 (Versus V5–V6) of Any Amplitude Is Specific for Occlusion Myocardial Infarction (Versus Nonocclusive Ischemia). DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.121.022866
Bischof JE, et al. Am J Emerg Med 2016. ST depression in lead aVL differentiates inferior ST-elevation myocardial infarction from pericarditis. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2015.09.035
Smith SW, et al. Ann Emerg Med 2012. Diagnosis of ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction in the Presence of Left Bundle Branch Block using the ST Elevation to S-Wave Ratio in a Modified Sgarbossa Rule. DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2012.07.119
Meyers HP, et al. Am Heart J 2015. Validation of the modified Sgarbossa criteria for acute coronary occlusion in the setting of left bundle branch block: A retrospective case-control study. DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2015.09.005
Dodd KW, et al. Ann Emerg Med 2021. Electrocardiographic Diagnosis of Acute Coronary Occlusion Myocardial Infarction in Ventricular Paced Rhythm Using the Modified Sgarbossa Criteria. DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2021.03.036
de Alencar Neto JN, et al. Int J Cardiol 2024. Systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy of ST-segment elevation for acute coronary occlusion. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2024.131889
de Alencar JN, et al. Br Heart J 2024. No false negative paradox in STEMI-NSTEMI diagnosis. Available at: https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=en&citation_for_view=ZBKuiKwAAAAJ:9wUeeRLfbNYC
Koyama Y, et al. Am J Cardiol 2002. Prevalence of coronary occlusion and outcome of an immediate invasive strategy in suspected acute myocardial infarction with and without ST-segment elevation. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(02)02543-1
Khan AR, et al. Eur Heart J 2017. Impact of total occlusion of culprit artery in acute non-ST elevation myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx418
Hung C-S, et al. Crit Care 2018. Prevalence and outcome of patients with non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction with occluded "culprit" artery - a systemic review and meta-analysis. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-018-1944-x
Mehta SR, et al. N Engl J Med 2009. Early versus delayed invasive intervention in acute coronary syndromes. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa0807986
Kofoed KF, et al. Circulation 2018. Correction to: Early Versus Standard Care Invasive Examination and Treatment of Patients With Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome: VERDICT Randomized Controlled Trial. DOI: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000640
Milosevic A, et al. J Am Coll Cardiol Cardiovasc Interv 2016. Immediate Versus Delayed Invasive Intervention for Non-STEMI Patients. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.11.018
Lupu L, et al. Clin Cardiol 2022. Immediate and early percutaneous coronary intervention in very high-risk and high-risk non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction patients. DOI: 10.1002/clc.23781

Read MoreRead Less

Episodes

01: Conduction Abnormalities After TAVR/TAVI With Chad Kliger

EP01 • Apr 23, 2020 • 27m 44s

In our first episode, Ankur explains his vision for and inspiration to start ‘Parallax’, and speaks with Chad Kliger from Lenox Hill Hospital in New York about conduction abnormalities after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR/TAVI), a review article published in US Cardiology Review 13.1 Ankur and Chad look at conduction abnormalities after TAVR/TAVI with a focus on basic conduction system anatomy in relation to the aortic valve, the mechanism, incidence, predisposing factors for occurrence, impact on mortality and finally, proposed treatment algorithms for management. Hosted by @AnkurKalraMD. Produced by @RadcliffeCardiology.

... 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

... 11 12 13

EP 61: The Year 2021 in Review with Dr Sukh Nijjer — Top Trials in Heart Failure and Cardiac Surgery

EP61 • Jan 17, 2022 • 53m 30s

In the second part of Parallax’s review of 2021, Dr Sukh Nijjer, Interventional Cardiologist from Imperial College London, and Dr Ankur Kalra discuss key advances in the field of heart failure and cardiac surgery.

EP 60: The Year 2021 in Review with Dr Sukh Nijjer – Part 1

EP60 • Dec 27, 2021 • 59m 18s

In the last Parallax episode of the year, Dr Ankur Kalra welcomed back Dr Sukh Nijjer, Interventional Cardiologist from Imperial College London, to review the most impactful events and advances in cardiology from 2021.

Parallax AHA Edition: 3 Trials that will change your practice with Dr Amit Khera

EP59 • Dec 06, 2021 • 44m 29s

In this AHA 2021 episode of Parallax, Dr Ankur Kalra’s guest is Dr Amit Khera, Professor and Director of Preventive Cardiology at UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas and Vice Chair of the Scientific Sessions. For this week’s show, Dr Khera selected three thought-provoking late-breaking trials that will inform or change clinical practice.

Parallax TCT Edition: 3 Trials that will Change Your Practice with Prof Mamas Mamas

EP58 • Nov 15, 2021 • 47m 52s

In this TCT 2021 episode of Parallax, Dr Ankur Kalra’s guest is Prof Mamas Mamas, Consultant Interventional Cardiologist at University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust (UHNM), Professor of Cardiology at Keele University and Senior Clinical Editor of TCTmd.

EP 57: Academic Success, Decision-making & Pragmatic Approach with Dr. Ambarish Pandey

EP57 • Nov 03, 2021 • 45m 52s

In celebration of Diwali, Dr. Ankur Kalra sat down with Dr. Ambarish Pandey, Assistant Professor at The University of Texas Southwestern Medical School, to talk about his career path and the questions that shaped his decision-making over the years.

... 11 12 13 14 15 16 ...

... 12 13 14 ...